previous | next

TMBG in Madison, 10 March 2005

  • Mar. 14th, 2005 at 2:01 PM
thank you for coming to the show
Whoa. Definitely a unique experience, and while I still love the full-band adult rock shows the best, I am very, very glad I didn't miss this one. Pictures and stuff, mp3s there and below.

setlist:
Older / Robot Parade / interview 1 / Meet James Ensor / Fingertips / (West Hollywood) L.A. House of Blues / interview 2 / Istanbul (not Constantinople) / Alphabet of Nations / Doctor Worm / interview 3 / James K. Polk / New York City // Flying V / Bed Bed Bed / Birdhouse in Your Soul

Well, we didn't at all know what to expect from this show, since there was hardly any information about it available beforehand. When we'd asked Marty about it in Ann Arbor, he didn't know anything either. It was billed as "a conversation, with music," and I was hoping it would be mostly music, but no. There was about an hour of interview (in three parts) and maybe forty-five minutes of music. But the interview parts were pretty fun and the music was interesting, particularly getting to hear songs like Fingertips and Birdhouse in Your Soul with just the three musicians.

We left really early, because we wanted to avoid afternoon rush-hour traffic out of Chicago. Okay, and because we wanted to be really early, which we were. Ridiculously early in fact, so early that all the people working the show kept looking at us like we were idiots for being there already. But we checked out the place, walked into the soundcheck (Marty was behind his drums and Linnell strolled by a few feet away from me, causing me to make a very hasty retreat), had some dinner, saw Them going off for their dinner, and were first in line. They opened the doors a bit early.

Luther's Blues is a really nice venue, much larger than than I'd expected based on the not-very-informative pictures on their webpage. There was an upper level with a bar, a slightly lower pit area (with another bar on the side) where they'd set up rows of chairs, and then this stage that had a kind of round protrusion in the middle. The instruments were set up in the rounded middle and there were three chairs at stage right for the interviewing. I'd really been hoping, against all probabilities, that this would be a full-band show, but there were only Flans's bass and guitar onstage, so I finally had to give up on that dream. Linnell did have a keyboard, though. It was not his usual and I assumed it was a rental.

We'd heard the show was sold out, but there were actually several empty seats, including one right next to me (in the front row! very sad that it went to waste). I guess that was the seat I was saving for [info]unsupervised, who wasn't able to come because of work.

Anyway, the show started with some music. Older (ugh! but seeing Flans doing the intro all by himself was at least a bit of a change), then Robot Parade. Flans was working the crowd hard with his boom-shaka-lakas, but it was a weird scene, because we were all sitting down (the energy was good despite that, though). Oh, and the audience was really old, much older than the usual TMBG crowd. I guess the older people were the New Yorker component of the audience? I don't know, maybe they were there for Andy Borowitz, but if they were, they must have been disappointed, because (much to my personal relief), this show was totally all about the TMBG.

Flans introduced Andy and the three of them got into their director's chairs at stage right. They'd set up another chair behind the drums, onstage, for Marty, so he got up in there, and was kind of sitting back in this dark corner. It was a peculiar arrangement, and They remarked upon it at the beginning of the first interview:
AB: Who's on drums tonight?
JF: It is Mr Marty Beller. Marty is gonna be drinking in the corner during this Actor's Studio-like presentation.
JL: Marty's not allowed to leave the stage.
(During the other two interview segments Marty went down and stood by the bar instead.)

Then they got into the interview. It's really hard to recap this part, because a lot of the funny bits don't make sense without their full context and it would take too much time and space to transcribe everything. But Flans loves the E! True Hollywood Stories (particularly the one on Diff'rent Strokes). And, when talking of their experience working together on their high-school newspaper The Promethean:
JF: We were basically part of a very small, unloved sect of our high school. We were above the A/V kids and below the stoners.
AB: Where are you now?
JF: I think we're parallel to the stoners. It's that incremental growth.
AB: It only took you twenty-five years.

About the origins of Dial-a-Song:
JF: It's kind of impossible to think of phone machines as being new, but when we moved to New York City, you know, besides graffiti and the constant fires that were burning, one of the things that made New York an exciting place was that New Yorkers had phone machines before the rest of the country got them.

So they chatted for about twenty minutes and then they played a couple more songs. After Ensor Linnell started introducing the next song, but Flans was having some trouble with his pedal so he got down on his knees to fumble with it.
JL: We're going to try something that we've done only once before—
JF: Hold on a second, John—stall!
Linnell began to ramble while Flans struggled with his pedal, occasionally uttering groans of frustration.
JL: I'm gonna say it again, only slower...So, this is a composition that I call a composition, because "song" doesn't feel right...This was so hard to learn that we had a special rehearsal that lasted about a week, and I gotta say, this song still blows. But now that we've learned it, it can never leave the canon, because if we forget it, we'll have to start from scratch...We normally do this song with our entire full band, the Dans. There are these parts in the song where—you're gonna see this in about a minute—where everything stops and we're all looking at each other and then we realize that it's somebody who's not here who's supposed to be doing something.

At this point Flans, with the help of Marty, had replaced the battery in his pedal and declared himself ready. And I was still wondering what the song was going to be, but when Flans and Linnell had a quick conference and Linnell said to Flans, "You sing the title," I realized it was probably Fingertips. Flans then asked Linnell what key the song began in. Well, if it was Fingertips—"G," I said to [info]hobbitgrrl; and a moment later, "G," Linnell said to Flans. I knew it! And the next thing Flans said was, "Everything is catching on fire." Whee!

The 3-man Fingertips was quite exciting, with Flans taking on Dan Miller's usual parts and acquitting himself rather nicely on the Darkened Corridors solo section.

After that, even more exciting, was the (West Hollywood) L.A. House of Blues. I love Linnell's goofy fake accent, and how Flans uses the same goofy accent in his backing vocals.

Okay, the second part of the interview. Ah, it's impossible to summarize this stuff! I apologize to my loyal readers for my inadequacy on this point. Here instead is a quick list of topics covered during these twenty minutes:
  • writing the venue songs
  • James K. Polk vs James Ensor
  • Russell Crowe and al-Qaeda
  • Colin Farrell and objective judgment of one's own importance/Flava Flav and New Kids on the Block
  • how Birdhouse in Your Soul was composed
  • U2, the World Bank, and Alan Greenspan
  • on "quirky" and "nerd":
    JF: "Nerd," we think of that essentially as an insult.
    JL: We were doing this event in D.C. with Sarah Vowell, so we drove down with her, and she for some reason is really into the word "nerd," and thinks of it as a flag to wave. She was like, "Wow, imagine if the car crashed. It would be like the nerd version of the Day the Music Died." At which point we kicked her out of the car.
    JF: The "quirky" thing bugs me because I feel like it totally guts whatever musical ambition we have. I feel like it just puts it in a very small envelope and crumples it up. It's just not an interesting idea for a band, it's smaller than life.
Then they played a few more songs. The crazy Kaoss pad version of Istanbul, then the extended Alphabet of Nations. Linnell played the keyboard, and, um, not very well. I also noticed that his keyboard solo at the end of the bridge was not nearly as lovely as Dan Miller's was on Conan. But Linnell hasn't performed this song on the keyboard before, has he? I think it was always Miller. So it's not surprising that he's not very practiced at it.

Flans said "Suriname" with this really sassy intonation, and afterwards Linnell observed, "We started doing that 'Suriname' thing. I still don't know what the significance of that is, but we're waiting for the day that some Surinamese person is deeply offended."

For the last interview Flans and Linnell switched seats, because Linnell had been at stage right previously and they both found it weird to be in the opposite places from when they perform. They talked about the ABCs project; when they mentioned the No! record there was a smattering of clapping, and Flans said sternly, "Check their IDs." They also discussed the proper pronunciation of 50 Cent's name and whether Linnell tests his kids stuff out on his son, and they chatted a bit about the experience of doing the Malcolm in the Middle music (how it was a lot of work), Doctor Evil (I was the only person who "whoo"ed at the mention of Flans's wife, and I was like, "Am I the only Robin Goldwasser fan here?!?"), the death of the music video, and their work on the upcoming movie of Coraline. Andy said he likes Fountains of Wayne who remind him of TMBG, and Flans told us that the Fiery Furnaces are a band that are "definitely worth checking out." Them, and Ella Fitzgerald.

Finally they went back over to do some more songs. Marty and Flans started in on James K. Polk, and Linnell totally missed his cue.
JL: It would have been really cool if I'd started singing right then.
No confetti cannons, obviously.

Then it was time for the Jazz Waltz.
JF: Ladies and people, you know what the music means.
We did, and screamed "Noooooo!" But we couldn't stop the show from ending. Flans thanked a lady in a red shirt, then a guy with a beard. When he pointed to the guy with the beard, I was taking this picture, and the next thing I knew Flans was pointing at me, saying, "Lady with the camera..." I was really embarrassed, and he could obviously tell, because he went on, "...it's not a problem, thank you for coming to the show." Aww! No, thank you! ♥ Flans ♥

They were finishing up; Flans said, looking genuinely amused, "This has been totally weird," and it had been, what with the interview thing and the music thing all mixed together. So they did New York City, and left, and almost immediately the house music came on. But we were all standing up by now and yelling and all that, and they did come back. (And if you look at the setlist, you can see that they hadn't planned an encore, they really intended to stop after New York City, so this was probably the first show I've ever been at where we actually made them come back for a real encore.) "I feel like kind of a dork running out while the music is playing," Linnell said. "No, me, me!" And Flans said, "We're just gonna play kids songs so you all go home."

So they got up there and Flans started putting on his bass. Flying V was, I think, the only other song left that Flans plays bass on, so it pretty much had to be that; and then somebody yelled "Flying V!"
JL: Flying V? Is that what you said? [with mock reluctance] Oh, okay. We weren't gonna do that one...
JF: This is a song about the letter V, its relation to formations of birds and the shapes of guitars. I wish we had a Flying V to demonstrate the shape of a guitar.
JL: Or some geese.
JF: Next time we're back at the Barrymore and we've got a bigger budget we'll have some geese fly over.
Okay, that's a promise that they're going to come back and play at the Barrymore soon, right? Anyway, this song is delightful. I was kind of "meh" about it on the CD, but the accordion line is just so sprightly in performance, it's a lot of fun.

After that people started yelling for more songs. We yelled "Marty!" and he looked at us quizzically, so I pointed to the mic to indicate that we wanted him to sing for us, but he shook his head. I guess it wasn't up to him anyway. They did Bed Bed Bed and Marty had his heap of sound-effect makers, including, much to our delight, a Flexatone. He ended by standing up on his throne and ostentatiously clapping together an extremely small pair of cymbals (maybe about 6" in diameter). They did not make much noise.

They finished up with Birdhouse which was also delightful. One thing that this show really reminded me of, with Birdhouse and Fingertips especially, is that, as much as people may (lovingly) mock Flans's guitar playing (and I've done it myself often enough; but no more! I swear), the truth is that Flans really can do it all himself; he doesn't actually need Dan Miller most of the time. Not to say that Dan doesn't provide some really fabulous window-dressing. (And, seriously, I'm talking about the guitar playing here, not the man.)

Then it was over and the house music came back on for real this time, although the lights still stayed low. I leapt onstage and snagged Flansy's setlist, and we waited to see if he would come out. He didn't, but Marty did, so [info]hobbitgrrl and I went over to show him the sequined initial wristbands that I'd mocked up with some sequins and glue that we were wearing in emulation of his (photo courtesy of [info]hobbitgrrl). He looked pretty surprised, came over to admire them, and then told me that I needed to give credit to his sister-in-law for the idea. Which I freely do—all of you here are witness to that. He got his setlist for [info]hobbitgrrl, signed mine and hers, and having recognized us as the ones who had been in Ann Arbor on Tuesday, approved of our devotion: "I'm in favor of your commitment," he said. Aw, thanks, Marty! (Wait—unless he meant, "I'm in favor of your commitment...to a mental institution for this insane behavior"?)

The place emptied pretty quickly and we realized that if Flans had wanted to come out and meet people he probably would have come out earlier when there were still people around, so we headed out. Not a typical show, but a good time as usual, and we heard a lot of interesting stuff in the interviews. So, yay! But I still want a regular adult rock show next!
 
 
mood: headachey
music: Elvis Costello, "Psycho"


Comments

[info]hobbitgrrl wrote:
Mar. 14th, 2005 08:59 pm (UTC)
(Wait—unless he meant, "I'm in favor of your commitment...to a mental institution for this insane behavior"?

Hahahahahaha! That's hilarious, and so true.

My pictures are actually on line now, I just haven't gotten around to making a post about the show. Durn finals.... :P
[info]pandaman27 wrote:
Mar. 14th, 2005 09:44 pm (UTC)
So why didn't you make mp3s of the interviews, those being the main draw of this show?
[info]aliste wrote:
Mar. 14th, 2005 10:47 pm (UTC)
Oh, I'm sorry that what's here already isn't enough for you. :P

I don't know why I didn't, I just didn't feel like it. And the interview wasn't the main draw for me, so, oh well.
[info]pandaman27 wrote:
Mar. 14th, 2005 10:53 pm (UTC)
In my defense...you're older than you've ever been and now you're even older.
[info]aliste wrote:
Mar. 15th, 2005 12:23 am (UTC)
Um...I don't understand, but okay. :)
[info]bec_87rb wrote:
Mar. 14th, 2005 11:12 pm (UTC)
"Nerd," we think of that essentially as an insult.

Hee hee!

Well, duh... but if the nerd fits, my friend.
[info]vovat wrote:
Mar. 16th, 2005 02:19 pm (UTC)
I think that there's somewhat of a cultural/generational gap at work there. It's more in vogue now for people to see "nerd" as a positive term, much like how other initially insulting words have been turned into ones that people wear with honor. The Johns, having grown up in a time when "nerd" was NOT a positive thing, have trouble seeing it that way.

While I don't see either "nerd" or "quirky" as negative, I think they're both rather dismissive when referring to music. I mean, does either one really tell you much about what they do? "Nerd rock" or whatever is a LITTLE more descriptive, since it implies they're somewhat intellectual, but it still doesn't give much impression as to what you're going to hear with TMBG.
[info]k1cup wrote:
Mar. 17th, 2005 12:37 am (UTC)
To be fair to Flans, I could see why he would bristle as being categorized as "nerd". I don't claim to know what he was like in high school, but to run a school newspaper and be friends with someone like Jimmy Mac would not pigeon-hole someone as a nerd. I think there's a huge difference between "intellectual" and "nerd" that is apparent even at high school age.
[info]bec_87rb wrote:
Mar. 17th, 2005 08:11 pm (UTC)
Nerd-dom is a lifestyle choice
Like your theory, but Mr. Flansburgh and I are *cough* in the same relative birth cohort, so he and I can't be suffering too many generational differences.

Not to say he can't be offended at whatever he pleases, but cool cannot be self-conferred, and I always took "nerd" to mean simply "person looked down upon by people for whom being popular is raison d'etre."

Wearing heavy correction glasses for nearsightedness is a basic nerd pride indicator. F has money; he could get eye surgery or contacts, but nooooooooo... he sticks with big chunky glasses. If he wants to be one of the cool kids, he has to lose the glasses, and start wearing clothes that cost your and my annual salary combined. Mr. Flansburgh claiming he isn't a nerd is like Gore Vidal claiming he isn't a homosexual.

Mr. F is a very smart man, see. If he loses the nerd chic thing, it would alienate half his audience, who also wear big glasses, work on the school paper, and hang with guys like Mr. Linnell, who clearly snorts at chic. He's on a stick, N, if he wants to be actually cool, because it would not go over well with guys like me who pay his salary.

Besides, to bristle at the "Nerd" label is tacit capitulation to the nasty "cool" people who use it derisively, don't you think? Are we not meekly bowing our neck to the evil "winner-loser" zero-sum schema for dividing up mankind?

From my little time seeing Mr. Flansburgh in person, you can't dismiss him, no matter what you call him. He has alot of "there" there.
Am I wrong?
[info]vovat wrote:
Mar. 18th, 2005 12:11 am (UTC)
Re: Nerd-dom is a lifestyle choice
Like your theory, but Mr. Flansburgh and I are *cough* in the same relative birth cohort, so he and I can't be suffering too many generational differences.

Did you consider "nerd" to be a positive term when you were in high school, though? That seems to be where Flans (and perhaps Linnell, but it's only Flans I've really seen complaining about the epithet) developed his distaste for the word. There could also be some regional differences. (Now I'm waiting for you to reveal that you also grew up in Massachusetts, and, in fact, went to the same high school as the Johns. {g})

He's on a stick, N, if he wants to be actually cool, because it would not go over well with guys like me who pay his salary.

True. I think a lot of it is aversion to a word, rather than to the characteristics that this word might suggest to the general public. I certainly wouldn't try to argue that the Johns AREN'T nerds, at least according to the way I tend to define the word. It's a somewhat ambiguous term, though, and Flans has said it was usually used to mean "loser" at his high school. I'm not sure it carried the positive connotations that some people give it today.

As I said before, I don't find the term "nerd rock" or "music for nerds" or whatever to be derogatory, but I DO find it to be rather meaningless. If you had never heard anything by a band, and someone described it as "nerd rock," would you have ANY idea what they were talking about? Also, I have a general distaste for linking musical genres with the personalities or subcultures of the people who make or listen to said music. There's probably a grain of truth in terms like "jock rock," "stoner rock," and such, but I still think they come off as rather dismissive.
[info]dbrycegh wrote:
Mar. 14th, 2005 11:20 pm (UTC)
Ahhh. Lady with the camera, thank you for writing up the show. :)

You shouldn't feel that your summary of the interview portions was inadequate in any way. You've painted the picture, and spared us the moments that Fans Like Us would find comparatively tedious (of which I'm sure there were probably a few).

I so wish I had been there for the things you mentioned, though. I just love it when they ramble all over the map, like on Studio 360, or in the Gigantic commentary.
[info]aliste wrote:
Mar. 15th, 2005 08:09 pm (UTC)
Lady with the camera, thank you for writing up the show. :)

Hahaha, you are welcome as always. As for the interviews, check my next post...
[info]k1cup wrote:
Mar. 15th, 2005 12:40 am (UTC)
Thanks for the write-ups. As always, informative and entertaining. The interview part sounds like it was fun. Congrats on being thanked by Flans.

Ella Fitzgerald! If he was being sincere, that's so cool.

JF: Next time we're back at the Barrymore and we've got a bigger budget we'll have some geese fly over.

Someone should tell him that geese make a mess. :P
[info]aliste wrote:
Mar. 15th, 2005 08:10 pm (UTC)
geese make a mess

Monkeys, too. :P

I think he was being completely sincere about Ella Fitzgerald. Andy had asked them about what their favorite music was, and they said they like to listen to old stuff.
[info]obsessical wrote:
Mar. 15th, 2005 12:40 am (UTC)
i love your show write ups :) It makes me feel like I didn't actually miss it. Sorta.

And if I *was* there, I would have "whoo"ed with you. Robin rules the school.

*cough*..and she's hot*cough*

Um, I'm sorry, did you say something?
[info]artmonkeygirl wrote:
Mar. 16th, 2005 05:19 am (UTC)
Next time we're back at the Barrymore and we've got a bigger budget we'll have some geese fly over. Well, you know I will have to fly out for that. :)

Hmm, geese. Say, there are a bunch hanging out by the college of Alameda. I could train them and then have them follow the plane out to the midwest to avoid embarrassing questions in security. Have them fly over and then they can fly back home when the show is over.

Yes, I am a very silly person. :P
[info]vovat wrote:
Mar. 16th, 2005 02:25 pm (UTC)
One thing that this show really reminded me of, with Birdhouse and Fingertips especially, is that, as much as people may (lovingly) mock Flans's guitar playing (and I've done it myself often enough; but no more! I swear), the truth is that Flans really can do it all himself; he doesn't actually need Dan Miller most of the time. Not to say that Dan doesn't provide some really fabulous window-dressing.

Well, throughout most of the band's history, Flans DID do it himself, didn't he? While there were guest guitar players to play the complicated parts on John Henry, I don't think there was a regular touring non-John guitar player until Eric Schermerhorn came along, and then there was another gap between when he left and when Miller joined.

I like Dan Miller, but, I don't know, it sometimes seems like having a second guitar player on tour makes them fall back too much on guitar solos, rather than trying something more interesting. For instance, I'd prefer it if they still did the "la la" bridge during "James K. Polk" (like they did on the original Istanbul EP version), rather than just having Dan play the solo on the guitar.
[info]aliste wrote:
Mar. 16th, 2005 08:45 pm (UTC)
throughout most of the band's history, Flans DID do it himself, didn't he?

Yeah, exactly. People (myself emphatically included) tend to forget that Flans can play the guitar quite well all by himself without Miller's help. So I'm glad I was reminded of that.
[info]k1cup wrote:
Mar. 17th, 2005 12:47 am (UTC)
it sometimes seems like having a second guitar player on tour makes them fall back too much on guitar solos

There's no question that Flans is a competent guitarist in his own right. But, adding someone who can solo with flair opens up the shows more. Otherwise, they would run the risk of playing the same song each night. The key is that they don't have overly drawn out solos.

rather than trying something more interesting

Sadly, I'm unfamiliar with their early shows. Did they vary much when it was just John, John, and Drum Machine?
[info]vovat wrote:
Mar. 17th, 2005 01:30 am (UTC)
I'm not that familiar with TMBG's early shows, either, although I've heard the odd MP3 and occasional mentions as to what those shows were like. I don't get the impression that the songs varied all that much from one night to another, but I think they were more likely to sound different from the album versions, and to incorporate gimmicks instead of more traditional solos. I think this has something to do with the fact that many of the earlier songs weren't really written with live performances in mind, and would have been difficult to play exactly as they are on the albums. Live versions of "Hide Away Folk Family," even during the full-band era, have the Johns instruct the audience to "scream like you're in Hell" during the bridge, but it would be pretty much impossible to have done the "daily home astrology report" stuff live. It seems like, once the Johns had access to a full band, they started writing more songs that were geared toward the band, so there wasn't as much difference between the studio and live versions of a particular song. That's not to say that they don't still write songs that deviate a good deal from the live and/or full-band format ("I Can Hear You," "Mr. Xcitement," "Skullivan," etc.), but they tend not to play these songs live very much, if at all. I might have been exaggerating the amount of songs where they substitute a simple guitar solo for something more interesting in the studio version; "Istanbul" and the aforementioned "Polk" are the only ones I can really think of offhand. (And, to be fair, the solo in "Istanbul" doesn't really substitute for anything; it's just tacked on at the beginning.)

As far as early shows go, I'm pretty sure they did some with just the Johns and a drum machine, and others with a backing tape. I don't know whether they shifted away from the tapes as time went on, or they would occasionally alternate. I know the Apollo 18 tour was the first one where they got a full live band to play regularly. I think Flans played drums on a few shows on that tour.
[info]aliste wrote:
Mar. 17th, 2005 02:29 am (UTC)
songs where they substitute a simple guitar solo for something more interesting in the studio version; "Istanbul" and the aforementioned "Polk" are the only ones I can really think of offhand.

I kinda love the Polk guitar solo—it's a saw on the recording, isn't it? Dan usually puts some vibrato in there and that amuses me 'cause it's like the guitar is trying so hard to sound like a saw, but just...not. Hee.
[info]vovat wrote:
Mar. 17th, 2005 05:27 am (UTC)
It's a saw on Factory Showroom, but the earlier version on the Istanbul EP has a sung solo of "la la"s. I'm pretty sure they've never used the saw in live performances (since they don't have a saw player touring with them), but they HAVE done the "la la" part. There have also been performances where Linnell just played the solo on the keyboard, which was probably the weakest way it's been done. (If pressed to it, I guess my ranking from favorite to least favorite would be: 1. "la la," 2. saw, 3. guitar, and 4. keyboard.)
[info]aliste wrote:
Mar. 17th, 2005 05:43 am (UTC)
Ah, I must admit that I am not familiar with the Istanbul EP. But I have heard live recordings of the "la la" bit. I find it kind of dorky :P , but I'm sure that's because the version I heard first was the saw one, so for me that's how it's "supposed" to sound.
[info]k1cup wrote:
Mar. 18th, 2005 03:28 am (UTC)
I see what you mean about relying on guitar solos. Not to diminish anyone's part (meaning Dan), but I'd like to see soloing everywhere. Danny used to do more, a la "The Guitar" in Gigantic. And then there's the absence of sax. Sadly, I have not been to a show where Linnell plays sax, which was absent during the Spine tour.

I too am unfamiliar with studio "Polk" and variations. Have they played "Skullivan" live?
[info]vovat wrote:
Mar. 18th, 2005 03:37 am (UTC)
I'm pretty sure "Skullivan" has never been played live. I'm not a big fan of the song anyway, but it's definitely different, and not really something that seems to have been written with the band or the live show in mind.
[info]artmonkeygirl wrote:
Mar. 22nd, 2005 09:22 pm (UTC)
Sadly, I have not been to a show where Linnell plays sax, which was absent during the Spine tour.

It seems to have been absent the last year and a half or so. The last time I saw him play the sax was at the shows they did in San Francisco at the Great American Music Hall in 2003.
[info]aliste wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2005 12:45 am (UTC)
He had the bari sax at the Vic in 12/03...but I think that was for the specific purpose of playing Santa Claus.
[info]artmonkeygirl wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2005 05:19 pm (UTC)
I think I was just so overwhelmed at being there in Chicago at that point that the presence of the sax just sort of slipped my mind. :)
[info]lostboydv wrote:
Jun. 9th, 2005 06:01 pm (UTC)
Woo. Sweet. You are a huge TMBG fangirl. May I add you to my friends list so I can keep an eye on you? People like you need to be kept under close watch, after all. Hehe.
[info]aliste wrote:
Jun. 9th, 2005 06:16 pm (UTC)
Heh, go right ahead. I've got five shows on the schedule for July, so get ready for a lot more posts like this...
[info]lostboydv wrote:
Jun. 9th, 2005 06:25 pm (UTC)
Sweet. I'm jealous, but the vicarious pleasure of reading about it will offset that quite nicely. :)